<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Any Significance to 65,536?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.automateexcel.com/2004/12/13/excel_any_significance_to_65_536/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.automateexcel.com/2004/12/13/excel_any_significance_to_65_536/</link>
	<description>Everything Excel. Only Excel.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 07:25:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.automateexcel.com/2004/12/13/excel_any_significance_to_65_536/comment-page-1/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2004 11:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-249</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dicks-blog.com/archives/2004/07/23/bitwise-and/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The bitwise post from Daily dose&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mat Matlock added this on David&#039;s blog:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;The IV/256 goes back as far as Visicalc. I presume, since that is 2^8, that there is a memory allocation that fits here. 1-2-3, v 1A, had 2048 rows, again 2^11 (I think). Later versions of 1-2-3 expanded that number to 8192, then early versions of Excel went to 16384, still 2^??. I believe it was Excel &#039;97 that finally expanded it to 65536. More of that silly 2^??, which probably relates to some amount of memory being allocated to the address.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dicks-blog.com/archives/2004/07/23/bitwise-and/" rel="nofollow">The bitwise post from Daily dose</a></p>
<p>Mat Matlock added this on David&#8217;s blog:</p>
<p>&#8220;The IV/256 goes back as far as Visicalc. I presume, since that is 2^8, that there is a memory allocation that fits here. 1-2-3, v 1A, had 2048 rows, again 2^11 (I think). Later versions of 1-2-3 expanded that number to 8192, then early versions of Excel went to 16384, still 2^??. I believe it was Excel &#8217;97 that finally expanded it to 65536. More of that silly 2^??, which probably relates to some amount of memory being allocated to the address.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Bigelow</title>
		<link>http://www.automateexcel.com/2004/12/13/excel_any_significance_to_65_536/comment-page-1/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bigelow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2004 09:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-248</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a pretty significant computing number and I don&#039;t understand most of it.  However, it&#039;s the upper 16 bits of a 32 bit number and is the largest value that can be handled by an openvms device driver (both from googlism.com).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dicks-blog.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dick&#039;s Blog&lt;/a&gt; has an interesting article on bitwise And that may shed a little light on this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a pretty significant computing number and I don&#8217;t understand most of it.  However, it&#8217;s the upper 16 bits of a 32 bit number and is the largest value that can be handled by an openvms device driver (both from googlism.com).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dicks-blog.com" rel="nofollow">Dick&#8217;s Blog</a> has an interesting article on bitwise And that may shed a little light on this.</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

