<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Webcast RSS Feeds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.automateexcel.com/2005/02/12/webcast_rss_feeds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.automateexcel.com/2005/02/12/webcast_rss_feeds/</link>
	<description>Everything Excel. Only Excel.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 07:25:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.automateexcel.com/2005/02/12/webcast_rss_feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-279</guid>
		<description>As far as I can tell, VSTO is exclusively for .Net developers, not people who develop exclusively in Excel VBA.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Possibly somebody with further insight might elaborate?&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I can tell, VSTO is exclusively for .Net developers, not people who develop exclusively in Excel VBA.  </p>
<p>Possibly somebody with further insight might elaborate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ross</title>
		<link>http://www.automateexcel.com/2005/02/12/webcast_rss_feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 07:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-278</guid>
		<description>I guess if you are developeing inside of excel itself, VST is not that useful?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess if you are developeing inside of excel itself, VST is not that useful?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ross</title>
		<link>http://www.automateexcel.com/2005/02/12/webcast_rss_feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 07:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-277</guid>
		<description>they are a set of good points!&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they are a set of good points!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.automateexcel.com/2005/02/12/webcast_rss_feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2005 15:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-276</guid>
		<description>Also, besides the need for 2003,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have to install Visual Studio to use VSTO, which costs 500$-1500$ bucks(US) depending on the version you want.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unfortunate.  So I&#039;m assuming VSTO is strictly for IT departments or users with fat wallets.  I&#039;ve never worked in an IT department and have a skinny wallet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In my experience, office development was always at the bottom of the IT dept&#039;s todo list, and office was so great because with a book/net and some free time, I could do the development myself, and I already had the VBA IDE sitting on my desktop.  From a non-IT-Dept employee&#039;s point of view, Seems like their giving the tools to the wrong people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;m passing and waiting to see what office 12 can do, hopefully everything VSTO can.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interesting stuff though, the task pane looks very useful when you can program it easily. And automatically turning a named range to an object is a nice trick.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Access DB connectivity is not that hard already, REST web services are starting to make sense &quot;as is&quot;, Soap/WDSL web services are a complex monster for me though, anything to make them easier would be an improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, besides the need for 2003,</p>
<p>You have to install Visual Studio to use VSTO, which costs 500$-1500$ bucks(US) depending on the version you want.  </p>
<p>Unfortunate.  So I&#8217;m assuming VSTO is strictly for IT departments or users with fat wallets.  I&#8217;ve never worked in an IT department and have a skinny wallet.</p>
<p>In my experience, office development was always at the bottom of the IT dept&#8217;s todo list, and office was so great because with a book/net and some free time, I could do the development myself, and I already had the VBA IDE sitting on my desktop.  From a non-IT-Dept employee&#8217;s point of view, Seems like their giving the tools to the wrong people.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m passing and waiting to see what office 12 can do, hopefully everything VSTO can.</p>
<p>Interesting stuff though, the task pane looks very useful when you can program it easily. And automatically turning a named range to an object is a nice trick.</p>
<p>Access DB connectivity is not that hard already, REST web services are starting to make sense &#8220;as is&#8221;, Soap/WDSL web services are a complex monster for me though, anything to make them easier would be an improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ross</title>
		<link>http://www.automateexcel.com/2005/02/12/webcast_rss_feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-275</guid>
		<description>Thought that was quite good, VST looks like it might save a lot of effort - will be intresting to see how it pans out in real life. I think the need for 2003 with hold it back for quite a while. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought that was quite good, VST looks like it might save a lot of effort &#8211; will be intresting to see how it pans out in real life. I think the need for 2003 with hold it back for quite a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

